Beatles vs. KISS

Yet again, a concert provides inspiration for a blog entry, in this case the Paul Stanley concert at the Ram’s Head Live in Baltimore last night. Paul Stanley is the rhythm guitarist/singer for KISS, and is touring for a solo album, using the house band of the "Supernova" TV show as his backup band. This particular comparison may evoke protests from Liverpool or Detroit/NYC, but I’ve long noticed that the two bands share some amazing similiarities.

 Both bands feature 4 guys from the lower rungs of society in large cities: the Beatles from Liverpool and KISS from New York City.

 They both have the same format: rhythm guitarist/singer/songwriter (John Lennon/Paul Stanley), bassist/singer/songwriter (Paul McCartney/Gene Simmons), lead guitarist (George Harrison/Ace Frehley), and drummer (Ringo Starr/Peter Criss). In each band the rhythm guitarist & bassist share the majority of the songwriting and talent (Lennon-McCartney & Simmons-Stanley), but the lead guitarist and drummer also sing and contribute musically, albeit far less than the other two. George Harrison and Ace Frehley both contributed about 25% of the material, and Ringo Starr and Peter Criss managed to sneak in about 10%. A major difference is that Harrison and Starr were talented and hardworking, and actually resented not having more input, whereas Frehley and Criss – if Simmons and Stanley are accurate – were content to do the minimum amount of work and mooch off the other two.

 The Beatles and KISS also started out with a gimmick: in the Beatles’ case it was the matching outfits, which they continued wearing through 1966 on stage. Combined with the haircuts and boots, this set them off from most other bands and established the precedent for the rest of the so-called British Invasion bands, including the Rolling Stones. In KISS’ case, it was the makeup and elaborate stage costumes, which they continued wearing until the 80s, after Ace Frehley and Peter Criss had left the band.

Among the core pair, there were also the "outspoken, I don't care who I piss off" John Lennon and Gene Simmons, and the "someone has to be polite and diplomatic" Pauls, Stanley and McCartney.  

 Of course, there are major differences. The largest one is the talent and development. Anyone can tell the difference between Please Please Me and Abbey Road. There is far less perceptible difference between the debut KISS album and Dynasty or Unmasked. Even in the 80s with Bruce Kulick, the formula never changed that much – why mess with what works...with the obvious exception of taking off the makeup, of course. The Beatles started off trying to be commercially successful, but around Revolver and Sgt Pepper they decided to make art and music for its own sake, rather than sell millions of albums or tour around the world. It certainly didn’t hurt, though, that this material was actually light years better than the earlier work and actually became the vanguard for popular music throughout the late 60s. KISS was, from day one until today, primarily dedicated to making money for the band, whether through selling albums, touring, or merchandising, which Gene Simmons has never been shy about admitting. They have no pretenses about being artists, poets, or anything more than musicians and showmen who give the audience its money’s worth. Whereas the Beatles quit touring in 1966 to focus on making albums, much of which involved elaborate studio innovations unreproducable on stage, KISS prided themselves on being a live band, and indeed the album ALIVE! put them on the map when the three studio albums they had at that point had flopped commercially. Clearly the Beatles were versatile and competent musicians, but even drunk-miss-the-plane Ace Frehley runs rings around George Harrison.

 Yet compare Sgt Pepper – a ground-breaking album – with any of KISS’ work. We get the Spinal Tap moment in the 80s when KISS unveiled their concept album, Music From The Elder, to a stunned record company. Sure, they had Bob "Destroyer" Ezrin helping, but what did they expect – KISS: The Wall? The band, with Ezrin, were proud, "look at it! listen to it!" and the record company was, "What the f**k????" Maybe you should stick with what you know..."Love Gun", "Lick it Up", "Uhh! All Night". Sure enough, they got the point.

 Other bands commonly compared to the Beatles are the Rolling Stones and the Beach Boys. The Stones, though, only have one singer, Mick Jagger, and are essentially a rock band, nothing more. Granted, they were in direct competition with the Beatles and even tried to emulate them to some extent, but never changed their basic nature over all these years. The Beach Boys are a closer relative. More of the band members sing, they had the matching outfits thing, but most importantly, with Pet Sounds and Brian Wilson they had a real song-writing focus and a very real competition with the Beatles. Sgt Pepper was a response to Pet Sounds, which itself was a response to Rubber Soul. Brian Wilson stopped touring to make albums, but his nervous breakdown after Pet Sounds made his artistic contribution much less than it should have been; who knows what might have happened if Smile materialized instead of Smiley Smile. The rest of the band had to step into his shoes, and their late 60s work bears the same resemblence (??) to the early 60s material as the Beatles’ does. All the same, nothing KISS did compares in quality or impact with Pet Sounds, though again, they never pretended or attempted to be "songwriters" or artists in the same sense as the Beatles or Beach Boys.

 Finally, an exhaustive comparison of the Beatles with other bands wouldn’t be complete without mentioning Pink Floyd. Syd Barrett and Pink Floyd recorded Piper at the Gates of Dawn at Abbey Road Studios...across the hall and at the same time the Beatles were recording Sgt Pepper. After a few heavy psychedelic albums, Waters took over and Floyd began making monumental albums, notably Dark Side of the Moon and The Wall (the latter produced by... Bob Ezrin!). But Pink Floyd, unlike the Beatles, never shied away from touring despite being heavily active in the studio: when recording, as much as they tried to innovate and push the envelope, they avoided doing anything they could not reproduce on stage. In fact, with their quadraphonic sound set up (with speakers set up in the back of the concert hall) Floyd have more in common with the Grateful Dead – sharing the distinction of being the house band at the London Underground acid parties as the Dead were for Ken Kesey’s California "Acid Tests" – factoring in the Beatles’ major contribution to 1967’s social and musical revolution... Sgt Pepper! So it all gets mixed up in one big mutually influencial stew, a psychedelic melting pot of electric Kool-Aid. One last nugget: Paul McCartney’s longtime girlfriend, Jane Asher, married Gerald Scarfe, the animator for Pink Floyd: The Wall.