I’ve been re-reading, for the third time, Harry Turtledove’s alternate history series which begins with How Few Remain and continues with three WWI stories, three interwar stories, and four WWII stories. Herein, the CSA won the Civil War (1861-62), also defeated the US in the so-called Second Mexican War (1881-82), and allied itself with Britain, France and Russia in WWI. For its part, the US found itself allied with Imperial Germany, Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire. Now imagine US and Confederate soldiers fighting in trenches, with biplanes, machine guns, and poison gas, but in western Virginia, Kentucky, and other locations. The CSA had purchased Sonora and Chihuahua states from Mexico in 1881, so their territory extends westward from Texas, along the New Mexico/Arizona border to the Pacific Ocean, giving the CSA a Pacific Coast port city at Guaymas. They also have Cuba.
Showing posts with label Libertarians. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Libertarians. Show all posts
Friday, January 8, 2021
GOP & LP 2024
It looks like we’re finally
getting rid of #45 and replacing him with a Democrat who most people choose
because he’s not nearly as obnoxiously incompetent as Trump and not nearly as
arrogant and unlikable as Hillary Clinton.
Over the last 4 years, the Republican President cost his party the House
(2018 midterms) and the Senate (losing both Georgia seats). He’s compromised the integrity and
reputations of all the Republican congressmen who were induced to follow him,
not that we’re particularly sympathetic to their plight. What’s next for the GOP?
Friday, May 1, 2020
Trump: It's Not About Politics
Lately
I’ve been vocal about calling Trump himself and his supporters idiots, and
gotten some flak about insulting people because I disagree with their
politics. What they don’t seem to understand, is that with regard to
Trump’s incompetence and our opposition thereto, it’s not about his politics.
First off,
I’m a Libertarian who was originally Republican. Here are my
presidential votes, starting in 1988, when I was 19: George H. W. Bush
(1988), George H.W. Bush (1992), Bob Dole (1996), Harry Browne (LPA) (2000),
Badnarik (LPA) (2004), Bob Barr (LPA) (2008), Mitt Romney (2012), Gary Johnson
(LPA) (2016). I have never voted Democrat, at any level.
I default to Republican candidates unless a Libertarian happens to be running
for that slot. I have some issues with
Democrats, which I’ll address in a later blog; for now, suffice to say that I
am not a Democrat and never have been.
FYI: Libertarians
are a third party whose basic premise is that the proper function of government
is to protect individual rights, not to redistribute wealth (the Democrats’
major problem), to legislate morality (the Republicans’ major problem), or to
start wars abroad or favor businesses with subsidies and regulations at their
request (both parties’ problem). As a practical matter most
Libertarians seem to be former Republicans fed up with the GOP, and when it
comes to stealing votes, the LPA’s votes are mainly at the expense of
Republicans. In addition to defending gun rights, Libertarians also
support legalizing marijuana, which leads them to be slammed by Democrats as
“Republicans who smoke pot.” Among the Republicans themselves,
the “Libertarian Wing”, as it were, is Ron Paul, Rand Paul (his son), Justin
Amash, and Thomas Massie. The LPA candidate for president in 2012 and
2016 was Gary Johnson, former Republican governor of New Mexico.
Trump’s
Politics. He really doesn’t have any. This was a guy born
rich from the start, spoiled for his entire life. A doctor
renting space from his father falsely diagnosed him with bone spurs, which kept
him out of Vietnam. Even Al Gore knew enough to go to Vietnam,
albeit in a non-combat unit, just so he could say he went; GWB went into the
Air Force National Guard, a unit which would not be sent
overseas. Trump has not been mayor, state legislator, state
governor, or US congressman. His sole experience in politics has
been in local, shady real estate deals, “you scratch my back, I scratch
yours”. He lacks the ability to understand politics at the abstract
level; he wouldn’t know Das Kapital from Mein Kampf from Wealth
of Nations. Tell him, "from each according to his ability,
to each according to his need,” and he would zone out, not even recognizing the
nature or source of that quote.
NRA. About
the only consistent political position Trump seems to be able to articulate is
support for gun rights. This isn’t because he loves guns, or is
passionate about the principle behind the Second Amendment. It’s because
he simply recognizes the NRA as a political ally, so he’ll support whatever
they ask him to do. If someone else tells him, “maybe it’s not
a good idea to allow private citizens to own guns which outwardly appear to
resemble the M16s our own military carries,” he’ll say “yeah, sure” and
unwittingly orally advocate gun control as a principle. Then a few
days later the NRA will helpfully remind him of their position, he will be
utterly confused, but will then simply repeat what they told him to
say. Given that I support gun rights, own several guns, and am
myself an NRA member, I have to say that on the one political position which
Trump most consistently supports, I agree with him. Not for the same
reasons, but hey…
Under
normal circumstances I would agree that calling someone an idiot because you
disagree with their political views is wrong. But I don’t do
that with Democrats, who are ostensibly on the other side from
me. At the extremes, I don’t think I’ve ever met anyone who
explicitly identifies as a National Socialist (Nazi), I may have met a few
people who self-identify as communists, socialists, or anarchists, and do not
recall ever calling them idiots for that reason, if any. I do it
with Trump supporters, not because they’re nominally Republican, or because
Trump is nominally the Republican president, but because Trump is an
idiot, Trump is incompetent, and his politics are irrelevant in this whole
equation.
Maybe you
can imagine someone you went to high school with, someone you could sit down
and have a beer with, and discussing politics the two of you would agree 100%
on the issues. But this person has never held office and is not
qualified to be the mayor, much less run the United States. Would
you say this person should be the President simply because you agree with their
politics? Come on, now.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)