Showing posts with label Westworld. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Westworld. Show all posts

Saturday, February 5, 2022

Who Wants To Live Forever?

 


First off, two nuggets of weirdness I’d like to share with my beloved readers, whoever you might be.

I went to buy beer at the Safeway, a regional supermarket.  Beer is an “age-restricted item”, which requires a Safeway Authority Figure to verify my State-Issued Vehicle Operation ID to make sure a child is not purchasing low-potency alcoholic beverages.  In her casual haste to fulfil her duties, the SAF entered my year of birth as 1169, prompting the Cashier Computer to go into “WTF” mode, meaning I would have to bring my purchase from the self-checkout register to the Actual Flesh & Blood Store Cashier register.  Once the Cashier verified I was 52 years old, instead of 852 years old, my beer purchase was finally consummated.  And there was much rejoicing.

Then, the weather report.  As my hearing is well below milspec (which is why I’m an attorney and not an Army-trained killing machine) I have the TV thing set with captions.  And in the wintery time, in a place such as Northern former Confederate State Virginia which sometimes sees that snow stuff, obviously that possibility was germane to weather reporting.  However, the captioning indicated that because the temperature would be rising above freezing, the snow would transition to “eyes”.  Raining eyes?  Really?  Now that’s a form of precipitation I’ve never seen.   Imagine that.  We’re all Mortys living in Rick’s world. 

I’ve been plowing through Westworld, Season 3.  Whereas season 1 & 2 took place in the “park” area, somewhere in Utah, season 3 takes us out to the real world, as the Hosts (Androids) manage to determine how to survive on their own.  Aaron Paul, aka Jesse Pinkman from “Breaking Bad”, is here as veteran with PTSD who ends up working with Dolores (Evan Rachel Wood).  Of course, the #1 issue is always, who is a guest (human) and who is a host (android)?

Biological Functions.  This came up during “Blade Runner”, the early 80s sci-fi film based on PKD’s book, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep, with Harrison Ford as Deckard, an assassin who takes out rogue replicants (androids), the main one being Roy Batty (Rutger Hauer).  Replicants are hardwired with a two year lifespan, which Batty is trying to fix, only to find that it can’t be fixed.  Then the faux-clever question is, “is Deckard himself a replicant”?  First off, if he was doing it for more than 2 years, then no.  But here’s another big issue.

Humans have these things called biological functions.  We eat, drink, poop, pee, sleep, get sick, age, and die.  Androids need at least some power source, but beyond that there’s no reason to program them with all those biological functions.  Why do so??? That would be like retro-engineering a modern car with the same features as a Model T.  Best to keep androids the way they are and not worry about making them replicate humans.

The really stupid thing is that aside from plot reasons, there’s no reason to show people in movies or TVs shows peeing or pooing, or getting sick.  So those occur off-camera, presumably, for any character who is human.  If you’re uncertain if you’re a human or a robot, the simple deal is:  do you get hungry and have to eat?  If you eat, do you poo?  Do you get older and sick?  The narrative of “Westworld” occurs over 20-30 years, and we see at least one human character age so much he’s played by two completely different actors at those different times.  But all the hosts – the most notable being Dolores (Evan Rachel Wood) and Meave (Thandie Newton) look exactly the same.  Well, of course:  an advantage of androids is that they don’t age and are theoretically immortal.

The catch is, how does a HUMAN get to enjoy that immortality?  How do you transfer your consciousness from your meatbag, aging, peeing and pooing shell, into that sleek, non-aging host body?  So far as I can tell, none of the guests from Westworld made that transition.  They can make host copies of guests, but while the copies might have memories of the guest, there is no continuity of consciousness; the host is just a copy, the original person eventually dies.  The best they can do is reduce all the hosts’ personalities and memories to a small globe which can be removed and inserted into any other host body.  They can also make copies of these globes and inhabit multiple host bodies simultaneously.  Think of how the narrative might change with that possibility.  Anyhow, none of us are androids and unlikely to be one anytime soon, or ever.

Robocop.  One scenario where it did happen, albeit under somewhat suboptimal circumstances.  In the first movie, Detroit, facing an unruly police union, decides to avoid the issue by making robot cops: a robo-cop made from somewhat deceased cop, Murphy (Peter Weller).  Robocop starts off as a robot, but Murphy’s prior memories leach back in.  In Robocop 2, they pull the brain, eyes and spinal cord of the subject (truly evil bad guy) into a second generation robot.  They had to use the bad guy, Cain; the good guys they tried it with first immediately killed themselves.  Is this a truly practical solution?  Probably not.

In any case, the insanely rich and well funded Delos Corp never seemed to manage to figure out how to transplant an original guest consciousness into a host body:  the best they could do was somehow copy the humans into a very convincing android who supposedly had the original’s personality and memories.  But if the original human simply died at some point, what’s the point of all these android copies?  It doesn’t do the original human any good, and doesn’t solve the ultimate problem.

The other issue is that our brains have limited memory capacity.  Once we reach that limit, new memories are only acquired at the expense of old ones.  So if you could live to be 1000, but your brain can only reliably store 100 years worth of memories, which of those do you retain? That would be 10%.  Then if you live to be 2,000, we’re talking 5%, and so on.  This sounds like a problem which will never be fixed no matter how brilliant the scientists are.  Let’s talk to Dr. Strange…

Friday, December 9, 2016

Westworld

Recently Episode 10, the final episode of season 1, was broadcast.  As yet I’m unaware if a second season will be on its way, but apparently plans are in place for that.   This is a remake of a 1973 film, which actually had a sequel (FutureWorld, 1976) and a brief TV series (Beyond Westworld, 1980), neither of which I’ve seen.

Basic Premise.  The company has developed a fantasy world staffed with lifelike androids (hosts) programmed to cater to the whims and desires of the guests (humans).  The main such world is WestWorld, patterned after America’s Wild West, while the original film also included a Roman world and a medieval world, both absent from the current HBO series.  As a practical matter, the male hosts act as cannon fodder – they can be killed, but their guns cannot harm the guests – and the female hosts are anatomically correct sexbots.  Well, in theory.  But the general idea is that the robots begin malfunctioning in a particularly deadly fashion – in the original, it’s attributed to an unintentional computer virus, in the HBO series we begin to wonder if it wasn’t intentional….

Westworld (1973).  Recap:  a pair of rich guys, Peter (Richard Benjamin) and John (James Brolin, the father of Josh Brolin) indulge in Westworld, where they can play out fantasies of being wild west outlaws yet – theoretically – not suffer the retribution of the robotic “hosts”.  The most noticeable is called The Gunslinger, played by Yul Brynner. 

Of course, nothing goes according to plan, and the Gunslinger proves capable of killing John.  He stalks after Peter, chasing him through the other two worlds with a final showdown in the depths of the company’s underground complex. The Gunslinger-as-unstoppable-killer-robot is a precursor to Arnold’s Terminator a decade later.  The “computer fantasy world gone haywire” is clearly similar to “Jurassic Park”.  Overall the movie is suitably disturbing and exciting – but one thing it isn’t is confusing.

Westworld (2016 HBO Series).  This is a full remake.  It’s missing RomanWorld or MedievalWorld - perhaps in subsequent seasons, but I haven’t seen anything in the current narrative to suggest that.  If anything, there are too many bugs in Westworld as it is, much less expanding.  However, they’re really knocking themselves out by bringing this up to the next level. 

It has an A-list cast.  Anthony Hopkins is here as the ultimate mastermind of the complex, Ford.  Others include (but are not limited to) Evan Rachel Wood, Thandie Newton, James Marsden (Cyclops in the X-Men films), Jeffrey Wright (from “Hunger Games”), Jimmi Simpson (House of Cards), and Ed Harris as a particularly nasty guest, the Man in Black – itself an intriguing role for an actor who usually plays good guys (e.g. John Glenn, RIP, in “The Right Stuff”).  Everyone does a knockout job in the acting category.  No complaints there.

The production values are high (as you would well expect from HBO), but where HBO really ramps this up from the movie is on two items.  First, the hosts (the robots) begin to develop self-awareness.  In particular, Maeve (Newton) talks to her human technicians and persuades them to upgrade her programming.  Eventually she takes her rebellion to the next level.

Second, the plot becomes extremely byzantine and complex.  In fact, it gets downright confusing.  Are there multiple timelines?   Are these events flashbacks or are they happening in real time?  Much of this seems to be from the perspective of Dolores (Wood), who is a host, not a guest.  Maeve’s point of view is also well represented, with Teddy (Marsden) a distant third.  Brynner’s Gunslinger never got that treatment.  But as I said, confusing.  To me that level of complexity compromises the enjoyability of the show.  All will be revealed?  Actually, not exactly.

While there were a few loose ends at the end of E10, don’t assume that means there will be a season 2.  Ever see “Dirty Sexy Money”?  The series ended on a cliffhanger yet the show wasn’t picked up.  Talk about frustrating…   

Comparison with “Jurassic Park”.  I posted a humorous meme on Facebook about this, but in reality Michael Crichton was behind both of these, so the similarities are hardly a coincidence.  However, I don’t see dinosaurs gaining human intelligence, much less self-awareness (T Rex to programmer: “Make me a vegetarian.”)