Showing posts with label WorldTradeCenter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label WorldTradeCenter. Show all posts

Saturday, September 11, 2021

9/11 Twenty Year Anniversary


 I had planned on offering a follow-up to my prior blog on abortion, when 9/11/2021 rolled by.  Looking from my balcony at night, I noticed a large searchlight going directly up to the sky, from the direction of DC.  It turns out that was the local area’s tribute spotlight honoring the Pentagon crash.

On Tuesday, September 11, 2001, I was working as an attorney for a sole practitioner (law firm with only one owner, no partners) whose office was across Route 123 from the Fairfax County (Virginia) court complex.  The Boss himself was down in Richmond for a bar meeting, so it was just me and one of the secretaries.   Sometime in the morning, the secretary notified me that “a plane hit the World Trade Center” (North Tower, 8:46 a.m. EST) and set up the firm’s small TV set, with rabbit ears, to watch the events unfold.  Sure enough, another plane hit the second tower (South Tower, 9:03 a.m.), a third plane hit the Pentagon (9:37 a.m., west side of the building), and a fourth plane crashed somewhere in rural Pennsylvania (10:03 a.m.) once the passengers figured out what was going on and charged the cockpit to take down the hijackers, at the cost of their own lives.

Before the second tower was hit, one of the news reporters remarked that “maybe” [the first] collision was an accident.  But you could see the plane flying directly AT the tower – obviously the pilot was deliberately targeting the tower itself.  When the second tower was hit, any lingering doubts should have been over.

What was really bizarre was watching the towers themselves actually collapse.  Before that point it was more along the lines of, “well, someone hit the building and put it on fire.”  The collapses really were the nail in the coffin.  Those collapses not only doomed the people still inside the buildings, but also the rescue crews who had been trying to save the buildings and the people inside.  The final death toll for all four attacks comes in to just under 3,000. 

Back in summer 1988 we visited NYC, and we got to visit the World Trade Center.  I found it underwhelming, compared to the deck at the Empire State Building (eighty sixth and one hundred and second floors), as the windows are back from the edge of the building.  While I was disappointed that the rebuilt WTC building was a single one instead of a pair, at least its observation deck is much better.

Living in Northern Virginia, Rosslyn to be exact, I had driven past the Pentagon too many times to count, most of them being past the face of the Pentagon (1 out of 5) which was struck on that day.  For awhile thereafter, the hole was there, but has now long since been patched up.

The major impact, so to speak, of 9/11 was to pull EVERYONE together.   Here was a terrorist act so brutal and compelling, our own generation’s Pearl Harbor, that even cynical liberal Democrats – at least most of them – were bludgeoned into sincere patriotism.  When it came to chasing down Al Qaeda and Osama Bin Laden, we were united.  For that matter, foreigners who were inclined to distrust us and look down on us, now took pity on us and we had effectively a blank check to seek revenge.  We liberated Afghanistan from the Taliban, tracked down and killed Osama Bin Laden (on Barack Obama’s watch) and soon after took Iraq away from Saddam Hussein.

Back home, Bush Jr. pushed through the Patriot Act and set up the Guantanamo Bay facility in Cuba to make sure Harold and Kumar weren’t planning any attacks.  Part of the danger of the attacks was goading us into becoming a police state – which we avoided – and overstepping our mandate, which we arguably did in Iraq. 

I don’t recall being any MORE or LESS upset by 9/11 than anyone else.  My hearing was still substandard, so volunteering for military service was no more possible than it was in 1986 when I graduated from high school and could not get into ROTC – or the National Guard.  I had no qualms or dispute about the Afghanistan operation, nor the subsequent Iraqi operation.  I suppose “liberation” still rings truer than “invasion” because notwithstanding our subsequent ball-dropping on nation-building in both countries, we were liberating each from a vile regime: the Taliban in Afghanistan and Saddam Hussein in Iraq.  Of course, the then-threatened weapons of mass destruction Saddam Hussein supposedly had never materialized, and many would argue that we knew they did not exist when we invaded.  “Donald Rumsfeld” is a name I hear mentioned in that context. 

Did we know it would happen and let it occur?  Well, there were stories that the FBI received reports that the 19 flyers were learning to take off but not land the planes.  I don’t believe anyone has proved, conclusively, that the administration had clear and convincing evidence that 4 jets would be hijacked and crashed into major targets.  These were innovative, unprecedented attacks.  The 1993 WTC bombing may have lulled us into a false sense of security, writing off the terrorists as more inspired than competent.  But a slew of other bombings overseas should have put us on notice that not all terrorists were buffoons.  Bringing back Pearl Harbor, many accused FDR of sitting on evidence of the attack to allow it to go through, but the actual intelligence we had was only that the Japanese were up to something- the fleet maintained radio silence on its way to Hawaii and we had no actual warning of the attack – until it actually occurred.  Fortunately for us, our four carriers were out at sea and escaped the attack. 

The bigger picture is this:  when we ARE attacked, and are legitimately the victim of the attack, how do we respond?   After Pearl Harbor we fought back against the Japanese.  Oddly, Nazi Germany declared war on US, not the other way around.  Nonetheless, we managed to defeat both Axis countries and fight wars on both fronts simultaneously. 

With our recent withdrawal from Afghanistan, obviously the question is: did we waste our time there?  I think the real answer is not that it was a mistake to go in there to begin with, rather the follow-through was botched.  A recent article profiling various US troops who served there from 2001 to the present shows an inconsistent approach to destroying the Taliban.  “Clear and hold” is supposedly the optimal strategy, but that ultimately means you need to surround the enemy completely.  It seems the Pakistani border was too porous to allow us to close it off completely, meaning the Taliban could hide there until we lost patience and left.  Sadly, the Pakistanis themselves were complicit in harboring the Taliban.  How much we could actually accomplish without their full cooperation is a big question.  If anyone has the answer, by all means let me know.   

The biggest success story at shutting down an insurgency was Malaysia, but there the Brits had the ability to shut off the entire country and the rebels were ethnic Chinese, not Malayans.  In Vietnam we did not have the prerogative to shut down Cambodia, Laos, and North Vietnam up to the Chinese border.  In Iraq, we deposed Saddam but had no plan on what would replace his regime.  Bottom line is, FOLLOW THROUGH.  Do not exceed the moral authority we earned when those Towers collapsed. 

Finally, here’s a discussion of KSM, man behind 9/11.  Unfortunately it seems the FBI and CIA did NOT coordinate effectively.  My impression is that KSM decided to taint his confession to whatever he was actually responsible for by taking credit for many other things he probably had nothing to do with.    

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed confessed to being the 9/11 mastermind. 20 years later, he’s still awaiting trial (yahoo.com)

Friday, June 22, 2018

Way Up High


No, NOT a weed reference – this time.  Recently I saw two things which piqued my interest in this topic.  The first is watching the Netflix show “Marseille”, and observing one particular building dominating the French city’s skyline atop the tallest hill in the city, the Notre Dame de la Garde.  The other was seeing a photo of spectators watching the Yankees vs. Pirates World series game in Pittsburgh from the Cathedral of Learning at the University of Pittsburgh.

Some of these, like the examples just given, are not particularly tall in and of themselves, but rise up high simply by virtue of being on the tallest part of the city, i.e. a large hill.  For the genuine skyscrapers I’ve listed heights.

George Washington Masonic National Memorial (Alexandria, Virginia).  The Heights of Buildings Act in 1899 restricted the heights of Washington, DC buildings, after the Cairo Hotel freaked everyone out.   Technically the tallest structure in the city is the Washington Monument.  The law was prompted by the Cairo Hotel and doesn’t have anything to do with the Washington Monument, which I don’t really consider a building.   Mind you, Baltimore has its own Washington Monument, but theirs is much smaller.

Rosslyn, Virginia, across Key Bridge from DC, has a fairly decent array of skyscrapers, though the tallest of these is still only 381 ft and nowhere close to what they have in NYC or Chicago.  Mainly you see them from Georgetown.

My own condo building, Skyline Plaza, at Bailey’s Crossroads, is 26 stories and about 333 feet tall.  Across George Mason Drive is One Skyline Tower, a building of similar height which stands higher due to having a base 50 feet higher.  The latter is a government office building with no observation deck nor access granted to ordinary people.  My building, and the South building next door, have impressive observation decks, and the view from my own 20 floor balcony is also pretty nice.  On the other hand, in periods of immense fog you literally just see a solid wall of white, which is weird but cool.

The George Washington Masonic National Memorial (Alexandria, Virginia) sits on top of a huge hill.  There’s a free tour which sends you up each level and tells you all about how Washington was a Mason.  Both the tour and the view are worth checking out.

Arlington County Circuit Court, in Arlington, Virginia.  12 stories, with a fairly decent view from the top of the surrounding area.  Though for most non-lawyers, a trip to the courthouse is probably going to be an unpleasant experience.

Empire State Building and World Trade Center, New York City, NY.  I’ve been to the ESB a few times, and both the original World Trade Center (Twin Towers) and the new single tower version, its impressive observation deck – much better than the previous one.  The ESB, at 1250 feet, was the tallest building in the world at the time of its completion in 1931,  surpassed in 1973 by the WTC at 1368 ft. itself replaced by the Sears Tower in 1975.  The new WTC is 1776 feet tall.

Willis (formerly Sears) Tower, Chicago, Illinois (1450 ft).   I haven’t been to Chicago.  In “The Blues Brothers”, the pursuing Nazis accidentally drive off an unfinished overpass and somehow drop down past the Sears Tower on their way to  street level. 

Cathedral of Learning, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.  Apparenlty not all that tall in itself, but up high above the city.  IF I’m ever in Pittsburgh I’ll see about visiting it.

That’s it for America the Great.  How about around the world?

Eiffel Tower (1063 ft), Sacre CoeurTour Montparnasse, and Tour First (Paris, France).  Of these four, I’ve only been to the first two.  Of course the Eiffel Tower is famous, and was the tallest building at the time of its construction for the 1889 World’s Fair in Paris.  It was originally intended to be taken down in early 1900s, but fortunately they changed their minds and let it stay up.   I visited in April 1979 and more recently in October 2017.  Sacre Coeur (Sacred Heart) stands up on the highest part of the city, Montmartre, the scene of where the Paris Commune broke out in March 1871.  The view is actually pretty nice.   Tour Montparnasse is relatively recent (1973), and although the Left Bank building does have an observation deck, I haven’t been there yet.  Finally there's Tour First at La Defense.  The Eiffel Tower is still the tallest building in France.

Notre Dame de la Garde.   On top of the tallest hill in Marseille, the second largest city in France and right on the Mediterranean.  I haven’t been to Marseille yet, though we drove by it on our trip to the south of France in summer 1979.

Burj Khalifa (2717 ft), in Dubai, UAE.   This building is now the tallest building in the world since its completion in 2008.   It was designed by the same firm that did the Sears Tower and the current WTC.  If anyone knows what the view is like, let me know – I haven’t been there.

Cristo Renentor (Christ Redeemer), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.  Corcovado, the huge hill upon which Jesus spreads out his arms over the city of Rio, is already well above the rest of the city and had an observation platform before the statue was erected in the 1930s, a gift from the French.   No statues for London or Berlin, sorry.  Although you can’t go up inside Jesus, the area around it gives a nice view of the city, accessible by cable car or a long and winding drive.  Enjoy.