More
book stuff about drugs. In this case, a
book written in 1860 by Mordecai Cooke, intended as a definitive guide, at the
time, on how to get f**ked up. Or
rather, how people around the world got high back them. Cooke has been accused to writing this to
suggest that what they do in China or India or South America is appropriate for
them and not for UK souls, but I didn’t get that impression. What Cooke was going for was suggesting that
our natural nightly downtime had some competition from various inebriants of
varying quality and potency, scattered across the globe.
These
were 1) tobacco, 2) opium, 3) cannabis, 4) betel nut, 5) coca, 6) Datura (aka
Jimson weed), and 7) fly agaric (Europe’s magic mushroom).
Tobacco –
why does this qualify as a sister of sleep?
Isn’t nicotine a stimulant? MC
cites an 18th century priest railing against the drug citing
blackened lungs of heavy smokers revealed in autopsies. So in
the 1700s they knew what tobacco did!
Amazing. But to read Cooke’s
account, you would think that tobacco was LSD.
So far it’s a chapter on tobacco itself, then a chapter on smoking it in
pipes, a chapter on snuff (tobacco consumed in the nose), and the next on
chewing tobacco (most popular in the US where everyone spits). Finally a chapter on “pretenders” (tobacco
substitutes of various types, none of which he considers comparable though
acknowledging that others do).
Finally we can move on… to opium. After a tedious
chapter on how opium is made (like anyone needs to know) he proceeds to finally
tell us: WHAT DOES IT DO. And so far as
I can tell it’s the LSD of the 1800s.
Except that it’s addictive. Thank
you, Albert Hofmann.
In fact there are not just one but – as with tobacco - several
chapters on opium. And what I found
surprising was this. By now we’ve been
consistently presented with the spectacle of the opium addict, reduced to
poverty and crime, health ruined, to support his habit. But apparently there were “chippers”,
occasional users, who may have used regularly but probably more like once a
month instead of daily. These opium
users show no health issues, lived long healthy lives, and had normal
lifestyles. In other words, they were
not addicts. Overall Cooke takes the
position that opium is actually no worse than alcohol in terms of aggregate
damage caused to its users and society as a whole (what economists would refer
to as negative externalities). He
observed that drunkards frequently became extremely violent under the influence
of alcohol, whereas chronic opium users retreated into a dreamlike catatonia
which threatened no one other than the user himself. The real problem for either substance is
excessive consumption, not consumption per se.
Next, there’s an extensive section on HEMP and HASHISH, with the inevitable reference to Assassins from
Syria. From what he says, recreational cannabis
use was well known at that time, except that it was extremely uncommon as such
in the Western world – that is to say, hemp
was well known in its non-marijuana properties but cannabis was only smoked recreationally outside the Western world,
with the Middle East being a consistent consumer of hashish, which is highly
concentrated marijuana. He makes some
brief mentions of Fitzhugh Ludlow, who was a contemporary of his. In fact, it would seem the express reason for
Ludlow to write his book, The Hasheesh
Eater, was specifically because marijuana and hashish were so little known
in the US at the time. Oddly, although
Ludlow’s book was published in 1857 and reissued several times in the following
decade, Cooke makes no specific references to it. Apparently he didn’t read it. For that matter, I don’t see any evidence
that Cooke actually even tried hashish.
And that looks to be the case with the majority of the exotic substances
he chronicles. I would hope he at least
smoked tobacco or drank alcohol.
Next is a chapter on coca
leaves, mainly consumed by the Indians of Peru. The active ingredient is cocaine, which was synthesized soon after this book was written,
and acts as a more concentrated version of the coca leaf. From Cooke’s writing it does not appear that
coca leaves were exported abroad for recreational consumption, and my
impression is that cocaine itself was initially marketed as a legitimate drug
before being banned and turned – much later – into the rich and famous party
drug. Even so, although far less
concentrated and effective than cocaine, chewing the leaves did produce a
substantial narcotic effect and this practice counts as a form of recreational
use, which was popular and widespread in that part of the world at that time.
Next are chapters – only one each – on eating clay/dirt/lime (quicklime/whitewash);
low doses of arsenic, obviously a
poison in higher doses, but also addictive and with no apparent narcotic
properties; Datura, belladonna, and
henbane, all of which appear to cause hallucinations but possibly
death. Betel Nut stains your teeth and
makes you high. Apparently he did not
try it.