There’s been some controversy about a famous scene in the
original “Star Wars” film (Episode IV: A New Hope) in which Han Solo and Greedo
meet up in the cantina in Mos Eisley.
Soon after arranging transport for Luke, Obi-Wan, and the droids to
Alderaan, Han is accosted by Greedo, an alien bounty hunter working on behalf
of Jabba the Hutt, the huge, ugly sluglike creature we all love to hate.
Initially the scene plays out with Han and Greedo shooting
each other at the table, with Han obviously winning the encounter. He did so by shooting first. Supposedly this made Han a cold-blooded
killer, so Lucas redid the scene so the two characters fire almost
simultaneously.
One argument I haven’t heard, and which I’ll make here, is
that Han DID fire first, but that doesn’t make him a cold-blooded killer.
He owes Jabba the Hutt money. He’s just made a deal which should give him
enough to pay off Jabba, though he’ll have to travel to Alderaan first to pick
up the money. In the meantime, Greedo
is trying to capture him – or shoot him – to take him to Jabba and collect the
bounty. Naturally, Han doesn’t want
that to happen. [Apparently bankruptcy
is not an option. In addition to this, in
a distant galaxy in which hyperdrive travel between star systems is possible,
they don’t have banks or checks.
Finally, in all these films, I’ve yet to see a single lawyer. Science fiction indeed.]
Oh, by the way:
wanted, dead or alive. In
“Django Unchained”, Christoph Waltz plays a bounty hunter in the Wild
West. Back then then bounty is the same,
dead or alive, so he kills his target, reasoning that (A) the bounty is the same
either way and (B) a corpse is less likely to cause problems or escape. In “The Empire Strikes Back”, when setting
up the carbon freeze for Solo and then Luke, bounty hunter Boba Fett warns
Darth Vader that “he’s worth nothing to me dead”, referring to Solo. So presumably Greedo would have simply
rendered Solo unconscious but would still deliver him to Jabba.
Anyhow, when Han is finally delivered to Jabba, he starts
off as a decoration on Jabba’s wall – in carbon frozen state – and is later
brought to the sarlaac (pit monster) to be “slowly digested over a thousand
years” (as per C3PO) – along with Luke. Neither
scenario is optimal for Han. So why
isn’t he justified in shooting Greedo first anyway? That doesn’t make him a cold-blooded killer,
just sensible. Enough already.
Guido? Greedo was originally called Guido and spoke
with an affected Italian accent. “I’m-a
gonna take you to Jabba!” But this
tested poorly with test audiences, so Lucas changed this to Greedo (signifying
an inherently greedy character motivated by greed, not working for the public
good) and gave us yet more of this peculiar Star Wars affectation whereby the parties
to a conversation are speaking different languages (R2D2, Greedo, Chewbacca,
Jabba the Hutt, etc. Of course, we never
see a conversation between two characters whose language isn’t English….). (True story.)
Pirates. By the way, Han is paid by the Alliance at
the end of “Star Wars”, yet in “The Empire Strikes Back” he’s still pursued by
Boba Fett. So why didn’t he pay Jabba
with the money? Apparently, tucked away
in the Star Wars multiverse, there’s a story taking place in the three years
which divide the events of the two movies:
Han and Chewie are robbed by pirates, who took the money Han would
otherwise have paid to Jabba. For some
reason this didn’t make it into “The Empire Strikes Back” or was simply added
later to explain the discrepancy.
Anyhow….
No comments:
Post a Comment