Showing posts with label starwars. Show all posts
Showing posts with label starwars. Show all posts

Friday, November 27, 2020

Sally vs. Carrie

 


In May 1977, my father took my brother and I to the movie theater at Quince Orchard, Maryland (Gaithersburg) and we finally got to see the first Star Wars movie – well after all our friends had.  In summer 1980, our cousins took us to see “The Empire Strikes Back” in Rockville, Maryland.  And in London, 1983, my brother and I saw “Return of the Jedi” at Leicester Square, with some highly vocal local boys who were kind of annoying.  But imagine our immense surprise when the bounty hunter taking Chewbacca in to Jabba the Hutt, and unfreezing Han Solo from his carbon freezing, takes off the helmet to reveal it’s… Princess Leia.  Soon after, the heretofore fully-clothed Leia now appeared in a highly provocative bikini – aka “Slave Leia” and a common sight in cosplay circles.  I think I speak for all males out there when I say that Carrie Fisher was definitely a knockout in that attire.

 Around the same time “Star Wars” came out, another popular movie came out.  In this film, a charismatic rogue, “Bandit”, drove a 1977 Pontiac Trans Am Special Edition eastbound from Texarkana to Georgia, distracting the police from a large rig carrying 400 cases of Coors beer further east than it could legally be sold at that time.  He picked up an attractive girl, “Frog” (Sallie Field) who was escaping from a wedding (Snowman, observing her bridal gown flying out from the Trans Am’s t-tops: “what’s she wearing now?”).  Her father-in-law-to-be, played by Jackie Gleason, wasn’t too pleased at this change of plans and took to pursuing the couple well outside his jurisdiction – as one angry local cop reminded him. 

 Sally Field and Carrie Fisher are two beautiful actresses who I sometimes confuse with one another: they are both very cute, somewhat short, and have iconic roles.   Field (DOB 11/6/46) is ten years older than Fisher (DOB 10/24/56) but remarkably still among us.  Fisher, sadly, passed away fairly recently (12/27/16).  Both are highly attractive, fairly short, and brunette.  Fisher has a famous actress mother, Debbie Reynolds (“The Unsinkable Molly Brown”), and I’m not sure Field’s parents are famous.   They both went on to other roles afterwards.   Fisher served as Sally’s (Meg Ryan) friend in “When Harry Met Sally”, and Field served as Forrest Gump’s mom.  

Friday, November 15, 2019

Han Shot First


There’s been some controversy about a famous scene in the original “Star Wars” film (Episode IV: A New Hope) in which Han Solo and Greedo meet up in the cantina in Mos Eisley.   Soon after arranging transport for Luke, Obi-Wan, and the droids to Alderaan, Han is accosted by Greedo, an alien bounty hunter working on behalf of Jabba the Hutt, the huge, ugly sluglike creature we all love to hate.

Initially the scene plays out with Han and Greedo shooting each other at the table, with Han obviously winning the encounter.   He did so by shooting first.  Supposedly this made Han a cold-blooded killer, so Lucas redid the scene so the two characters fire almost simultaneously.

One argument I haven’t heard, and which I’ll make here, is that Han DID fire first, but that doesn’t make him a cold-blooded killer.

He owes Jabba the Hutt money.  He’s just made a deal which should give him enough to pay off Jabba, though he’ll have to travel to Alderaan first to pick up the money.   In the meantime, Greedo is trying to capture him – or shoot him – to take him to Jabba and collect the bounty.   Naturally, Han doesn’t want that to happen.  [Apparently bankruptcy is not an option.   In addition to this, in a distant galaxy in which hyperdrive travel between star systems is possible, they don’t have banks or checks.  Finally, in all these films, I’ve yet to see a single lawyer.  Science fiction indeed.]

Oh, by the way:  wanted, dead or alive.   In “Django Unchained”, Christoph Waltz plays a bounty hunter in the Wild West.  Back then then bounty is the same, dead or alive, so he kills his target, reasoning that (A) the bounty is the same either way and (B) a corpse is less likely to cause problems or escape.   In “The Empire Strikes Back”, when setting up the carbon freeze for Solo and then Luke, bounty hunter Boba Fett warns Darth Vader that “he’s worth nothing to me dead”, referring to Solo.   So presumably Greedo would have simply rendered Solo unconscious but would still deliver him to Jabba.

Anyhow, when Han is finally delivered to Jabba, he starts off as a decoration on Jabba’s wall – in carbon frozen state – and is later brought to the sarlaac (pit monster) to be “slowly digested over a thousand years” (as per C3PO) – along with Luke.  Neither scenario is optimal for Han.   So why isn’t he justified in shooting Greedo first anyway?  That doesn’t make him a cold-blooded killer, just sensible.  Enough already.

Guido?   Greedo was originally called Guido and spoke with an affected Italian accent.  “I’m-a gonna take you to Jabba!”  But this tested poorly with test audiences, so Lucas changed this to Greedo (signifying an inherently greedy character motivated by greed, not working for the public good) and gave us yet more of this peculiar Star Wars affectation whereby the parties to a conversation are speaking different languages (R2D2, Greedo, Chewbacca, Jabba the Hutt, etc.  Of course, we never see a conversation between two characters whose language isn’t English….).   (True story.)

Pirates.   By the way, Han is paid by the Alliance at the end of “Star Wars”, yet in “The Empire Strikes Back” he’s still pursued by Boba Fett.   So why didn’t he pay Jabba with the money?  Apparently, tucked away in the Star Wars multiverse, there’s a story taking place in the three years which divide the events of the two movies:  Han and Chewie are robbed by pirates, who took the money Han would otherwise have paid to Jabba.  For some reason this didn’t make it into “The Empire Strikes Back” or was simply added later to explain the discrepancy. 

Anyhow….

Thursday, May 31, 2007

Star Wars 1977-2007


It’s now been 30 years since the first movie came out.  I was 8 years old at the time and remember it well.

            A brief bit of background.  Back in 1977, we were still living in Maryland.  Jimmy Carter was President of the US, Brezhnev was running the USSR, and Iran was still run by the Shah.  VCRs & DVDs were unknown, cable TV was nonexistent.  You could rent a projector and some films – in those large metal tins – but the inconvenience of doing so was such that it was only practical for birthday parties and special occasions, not for an otherwise dull Friday night.  There was no Erol’s, no Blockbuster, no Hollywood Video, no Netflix.  Bottom line was: if you didn’t see a film in the movie theater when it came out, you weren’t going to see it. None of this business we have today of “ahh, I’ll wait for it to come out on DVD or cable.”  And even if you did like a film, you only saw it once.  
   
            Then came “Star Wars”.  People went nuts.  Literally everyone was talking about it.  My friends had seen it several times – unheard of for anyone to see a film in the theater more than once – and had the action figures before we had even seen it once.  Finally my father took my brother and I to see it, and we were hooked.  This was, bar none, the best film we had ever seen.  And there was no shortage of people who shared that opinion.  No movie had gripped the country so universally as “Star Wars” did.

 Star Wars.  We’re introduced to Luke Skywalker, a simple farm boy on Tattooine; Obi-Wan “Ben” Kenobi, the mysterious Jedi Knight; Han Solo & Chewbacca, the rogues; C3PO and R2-D2, the droids; the spunky yet cute Princess Leia; and of course, Darth Vader – 7 feet tall of black plastic and bad-ass James Earl Jones voice.  Here was a villain you could really sink your teeth into – bad and cool at the same time.
            Then there was the dialogue, half the clever lines from Solo’s mouth: “...that’s because a droid doesn’t rip your arms from your sockets when it loses...”; “I hope that old man fixed the tractor beam, otherwise this is going to be one short trip”; “I don’t know, I can imagine quite a bit!”; “I don’t care what you smell!”; “Attacking a Death Star sounds like suicide to me,” and so on.  Even the droids get some snappy conversation, with C3PO and R2-D2 bickering on Tattooine like a couple.  They’re not simple toasters or appliances, they have personalities of their own (gay robots!  Now that’s original!). 
            The plot was simple: they go to the Death Star, rescue the Princess, Obi-Wan gets killed by Vader, they escape to the rebel planet, the Death Star follows them back, and finally they destroy the Death Star at the last moment with help from The Force and Han Solo.  Good vs. Evil, and good wins. 

 The Empire Strikes Back.   By this point, summer 1980, we were living in Paris and came back to the US for home leave.  We saw the film with our cousins.  Boy, what a difference.  Luke goes off to Degobah to learn how to be a Jedi from a little green muppet, Yoda (“you seek YODA!”); Han, Leia, Chewie & the droids get captured in Cloud City by Darth Vader & Boba Fett, no thanks to Mr Smooth “Colt 45” Ladies Man, Lando Calrissian; Luke makes his way back, ignoring Yoda and Obi-Wan, and loses his hand in the climactic battle with Darth Vader, who announces, much to our surprise (HOLY SHIT!) that “Luke, I AM YOUR FATHER!”  We know that now, of course, but at the time it hit us like a ton of bricks.  Darth Vader, Mr Evil, is Luke’s father? WTF???  And Han encased in carbonite, prisoner of Boba Fett – and this LOVE developing between him and Leia?  Hold on, what’s going on here? 

 Return of the Jedi.  We had to wait 3 years (and during a hot summer in London)...to see Leia in a bikini!  No...wait... to see Luke finish his Jedi training and return to face Darth Vader, now knowing that he is his father.  And we find out that Luke is Leia’s brother, so the way is clear for Han to marry her (how conVENient!).  I could do without the Ewoks, but they had a role to play in this (picture C3PO floating around in a chair, after having warned Luke that, “I’m not programmed to impersonate a diety!”).  The “attack the second Death Star” was somewhat of a repeat (though with Lando at the controls of the Falcon) while we had Luke battling Vader – again - while the Emperor laughed and sneered.  Did he FORSEE that Vader was going to drop him down the shaft?  Apparently not.  Then finally some quality time, however brief, between Vader & Luke, and the mask comes off at last.  And Han and Leia get married.  Happily ever after!  “...and there was much rejoicing!!!”

             Next to these three, the “prequels” don’t come close to the same power and dynamic.  The action is there – iPod races, great star battles, light saber dueling between the various Darths and Grievouses, (even Yoda getting some action there) etc. but somehow something is missing.  “The Phantom Menace” is far too weak as a beginning, and although “Attack of the Clones” and “Revenge of the Sith” get progressively better – and finally tie into Episode IV at the end – the weak link in the chain prevents what would otherwise be a fantastic 6 film series from being what it should be.  None of the characters of the first three movies come near close to as bad as Jar-Jar Binks, and Amidala is NO Princess Leia – one daughter who far exceeds her mother.  The best part is Ewan McGregor as the young Obi-Wan Kenobi, particularly the way he easily disposes of General Grievous.

            It’s also amazing to learn, knowing the vast success of “Star Wars” and its sequels, that (as with many other dramatically successful films) it almost never got made.  Lucas had phenomenal problems with the first film and at Fox, Alan Ladd was the only one backing him.  To everyone else at the studio, this was some crackpot with a crazy space epic no one would take seriously.  Just imagine some Hollywood type, pointing fingers like “guns”, yakking away, “see, here’s the story...there’s this kid, right, Skywalker, he’s on a farm, and these robots, see, like, come out of space, and the Empire is looking for them, right?  And he goes to an old guy with a light sword, and they go off with a pirate and a big hairy ape, to some Death Star, and there’s this really cute Princess, and a tall bad guy in a black plastic mask...”  You get the picture.  The trailers do a fantastic job of making an excellent film look like it will be nothing better than 90 cheesy minutes of space crap.  It’s a good thing so many people saw the film for themselves and spread the word far more effectively than the studio’s inane marketing efforts.  This was the magic of... “STAR WARS.”

 Obsession.  Among the Star Trek faithful, a distinction is made between “Trekkers” and “Trekkies”, implying that the former have their devotion under control and the latter have some unhealthy obsession with the series.  There seems to be a similar obsession with regard to Star Wars.  An entire industry has sprung up, including various novels and graphic series.  Boba Fett has a life of his own – whereas his role in the movies is limited to a few lines.  Are all the other bit players – Hammerhead, the robot bounty hunter, Greedo, etc. – entitled to be fleshed out into full characters?  I don’t read the Star Wars novels or comics, don’t go to the conventions, and I don’t even have Episodes I-III or Clone Wars on DVD – nor did I camp out for any of the films.  On “That 70s Show” Eric Foreman is the geeky character assigned the unhealthy obsession with the movie (at a time at which even “The Empire Strikes Back” hadn’t come out).  I will admit that when we were kids in the late 70s, we did collect the action figures (including the large Darth Vader and Chewbacca ones) and the X-Wing and Tie Fighter toys.  By the time “ESB” rolled by we had gotten bored with Star Wars and had moved on to GI JOE and Britains figures, mainly because by then I was living in Europe and beginning my obsession with World War II, particularly Germany...but that, as they say, is a different story.... 

Thursday, March 8, 2007

Love At First Hate


Maggie Gyllenhaal sneers "TAXMAN!!!" at Will Ferrell...as Howard Crick, in the movie "Stranger Than Fiction". Yet by the end of the film they’re very good friends. Yet again, Hollywood gives us "love at first hate": the romantic couple start off hating each other, gradually get to know each other, and eventually fall in love. Great story, huh? How many different times have we heard it? Here are just a few:

 "Stranger Than Fiction" - Will Ferrell (IRS Agent) and Maggie Gyllenhaal (socialist-anarchist baker). He’s sent to audit her – and ends up giving her tax advice in bed

 "Cars" – Sally Carrera (Bonnie Hunt) and Lightning McQueen (Owen Wilson). Ok, they’re cartoons. Do they still count?

 "The Sound of Music" – as mentioned earlier. Initial mutual disagreement between Fraulein Maria (Julie Andrews) and Captain Von Trapp (Christopher Plummer) turns to love. Awww....

 "Star Wars" - Princess Leia (Carrie Fisher) and Han Solo (Harrison Ford); from bickering in the ice tunnels on Hoth to kissing on the Falcon...in the same movie ("The Empire Strikes Back").

 "When Harry Met Sally" – Harry (Billy Crystal) and Sally (Meg Ryan); it takes 10 years but they hook up! "I’ll have what she’s having."

 "Gone With the Wind" – Rhett Butler (Clark Gable) and Scarlett O’Hara (Vivien Leigh). Actually, the animosity here is one-way; when Butler takes an immediate shine to Scarlett but she can’t stand him. Oddly, he’s the one who leaves her! "Frankly, my dear, I don’t give a damn!"

 "The Goodbye Girl" – Marsha Mason and Richard Dreyfus. Dreyfus crashes in her house and eventually her heart.

 "You’ve Got Mail" – Meg Ryan AGAIN. Maybe it needs to be updated: "You’ve got SMS!"

 "Moonlighting" - David Addison (Bruce Willis) and Maddie Hayes (Cybill Shepherd) initially spar off against each other as private detectives but eventually wind up together. 

 And we can go all the way back and blame Shakespeare for this: "Much Ado About Nothing", with Benedick & Beatrice as the quarreling couple who eventually fall in love with each other. But in the same play, Claudio and Hero fall in love at first sight. Even here it’s balanced by another opposite dynamic. This is well illustrated in the movie version from 1993, with Kenneth Branagh as Benedick and Emma Thompson (aka Karen Eiffel in "Stranger Than Fiction") as Beatrice – also featuring Keanu "WHOAAA" Reeves, Denzel Washington, Michael Keaton, and Kate Beckinsale.

 With every woman I’ve been romantically involved with, the first reaction was always positive – "love at first sight" has happened to me; "love at first hate"? Uhh, no – not yet. The one girl with whom I have a Benedick & Beatrice relationship, now, is still miles apart from me romantically and geographically [I can't remember who she is]. I never did hook up with the prior girl (Heather) with whom I sparred like that. It’s tempting to try to perceive some sort of passion and love under the mutual antipathy, but for all the mysteries, lies, inconsistencies and illusions associated with love and romance, sometimes the truth is staring us right in the face: mutual antipathy is, in fact....mutual antipathy, not love. Underneath the shit is – more shit.

 And that holds true for everyone else I’ve known. "Love at first sight" appears to be far more common in real life than "love at first hate", which is what we’re given over and over again in the movies. My guess is that "love at first sight" makes for a much more direct and less interesting plot than "love at first hate", which is why more movies focus on the latter than the former. We love to see the ice melt, the contempt fade away, and also appreciate this idea of "damn, I hate that [woman/man], but why can’t I stop thinking about [her/him]?" "I love you, despite myself!" "I hate myself for loving you," etc. It’s a powerful, passionate dynamic, and hard to resist using. I’ll admit it’s interesting, even if it is much less realistic.

 Keep this in mind next time you think someone who hates you actually loves you. Chances are they really do hate you.