Showing posts with label spain. Show all posts
Showing posts with label spain. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 23, 2011

Spanish-American War

Time for another round of “obscure wars no one cares about!” (except maybe Cubans, Filipinos or Puerto Ricans). This week:  the Spanish-American War of 1898.  Just as the Russo-Japanese War (1905) was Japan’s opportunity to defeat a European country (Tsarist Russia), this was America’s chance to knock down on Spain, which had by then deteriorated into just another half-assed European country with a bunch of overseas colonies it could no longer adequately protect.  Instead of fighting at home in Virginia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, or out on the Plains against Indians (American type, not 7-11) the US was off to Cuba, Puerto Rico, and far off in the Pacific to the Philippines.


 Cuba.  The Spanish had been having problems with a native Cuban insurgency (the Army of Liberation) in the late 1800s.  By 1895 another one had erupted.  Popular sentiment in the US supported the insurgency.   Before Che Guevara (who was Argentinian, by the way), the popular hero of Cuba was Maximo Gomez, a general in the Army of Liberation.
            On February 15, 1898, the US battleship Maine, (built to compete with Brazil’s dreadnought the Riachuelo, which had scared the hell out of the Americans) anchored in Havana harbor, mysteriously exploded and sank.  Although no one knows who was responsible, the Spanish were blamed anyway.  By April 25, the US had declared war on Spain.
            As was so often the case with US getting into wars, the standing peacetime army was far too small, and a volunteer army had to be raised and trained from scratch.  The volunteers camped at Camp Alger, which was actually close by to where my office is now:  Route 50 west of Graham Road in northern Virginia
            On June 22, US forces landed in southeast Cuba near Santiago.  The harbor defenses were too strong to directly defeat, so a prolonged siege from both land and sea was what ultimately broke the Spanish.  The US fleet blockaded the Spanish fleet at Santiago, while various land forces, including Roosevelt’s Rough Riders, took on the Spanish forces on the mainland; by July 1, San Juan Hill was in US hands.  This completed the land-side siege of Santiago.  An attempt by the Spanish fleet to break out was unsuccessful.  On July 17 the garrison surrendered, which ended the war in Cuba.

 The Rough Riders.  Officially known as the 1st US Volunteer Cavalry, led by Theodore Roosevelt.  Their uniform was a blue flannel shirt, slouch hat, bandana, and leggings; they used the Krag-Jorgensen bolt-action rifle, .30-40 caliber.  The Rough Riders attracted an amazing variety of adventurous characters:  American Indians, cowboys, athletes, anyone with some military experience (Civil War or Indian War) or horseriding skill, almost an American version of the French Foreign Legion.

 Puerto Rico.  US troops landed on July 25.  By August 13 the Spanish had surrendered.

 The Philippines.  As with Cuba, there was a native insurgency in the Philippines, the major player being Emilio Aguinaldo.  When the US entered war with Spain, Aguinaldo, who had been in exile in Hong Kong after the last rebellion, negotiated his return to the Philippines.  As with Cuba, the war against Spain in this area had a naval and land aspect.  On sea, Admiral Dewey defeated the Spanish fleet in Manila Bay on May 1.  On June 30, US troops debarked at Cavite; by August 13, the Spanish had surrendered.
            But this didn’t end the hostilities.  The Filipino insurgents, who had been expecting full independence in exchange for assisting the US invasion (liberation?) were shocked and disappointed when the end of the war simply transferred ownership from Spain to the US.  Then began an “insurgency” which lasted far longer than the original war; the locals put up a much tougher fight than the Spanish had.  The “official” end was declared in April 1902, but sporadic clashes with primitive Muslim Moro tribes continued on until the 1920s.  The US finally granted the Philippines independence on July 4, 1946.  Aguinaldo himself lived until 1964, age 94.

 Uniforms and equipment.  This was about the time the Navy switched from the older “Donald Duck” hat for sailors to the current Dixie Cup variety.  For its part, the Army was switching over from dark blue (since the Civil War) to khaki, a completely different color far better suited to the realities of modern warfare, and in much lighter, more comfortable materials.  The latter was important as for the first time US soldiers were fighting in tropical conditions different than experienced at home in the United States. 
            Spanish soldiers typically wore a cotton tropical uniform, called rayadillo, in white with narrow blue vertical stripes.  To modern eyes – or at least mine – they look like pajamas.  Their rifle was the 1893 Spanish Mauser (7mm Mauser), which was actually superior to the US rifles, both the obsolete trapdoor Springfields (.45-70, single shot) and the Krags.  It was the success of this rifle which led the US to adopt the Mauser bolt action system on the 1903 Springfield.  Another popular rifle was the Remington rolling block, typically in 11mm (.43) as used by the Spanish.     

Thursday, January 27, 2011

Spain's Blue Division

More war!  Oh boy!  And yes, Nazis are involved…in a way.

 When Hitler invaded Russia in 1941, he needed some help, as the Russians had far more men than the Germans.  Using his political muscle, he convinced the Finns, Czechs, Hungarians, Romanians, Italians, and Spanish to contribute forces to the mix, not counting the volunteers who flocked to the Waffen SS, or turncoat Russians, Ukrainians, Estonians, Latvians, Lithuanians, Georgians, Armenians, and other locals who weren’t too thrilled with Stalin and were willing to fight against him alongside the Germans.

 Unlike the Hungarians and Romanians, however, the Spanish unit was completely volunteers.  In fact, Franco was not keen on sending forces.  Without a doubt, there is no way Franco could have won in Spain without Hitler’s help.  German Ju-52s airlifted Franco’s army from Morocco to Spain, and the Condor Legion helped give Franco air superiority; German weapons and advisors were also extremely critical in securing the Fascist victory.  Yet when it came to reciprocate for Hitler, Franco was extremely reluctant.  Basically he walked out of the German restaurant without paying for his high quality schnitzel, schnapps, and a nice little BJ under the table from Helga. 

 But these men were eager to serve.  Why?  These were Falangists who were (A) grateful to Hitler for helping the Generalissimo eradicate the plague of communism from Spain, and (B) hated communism enough to go to the frozen swamps of North Russia to fight the Red Army.  Just as the Waffen SS veterans serving in the French Foreign Legion in North Vietnam saw that conflict as an extension of their own battles on the Eastern Front in WWII, so did these Spaniards view the battle against the Red Army as an extension of the prior battle against communists in Spain in their own civil war, which had ended just two years before.  In other words, what Franco was unwilling to do, these men were. 

 Sidetrack on anti-communism.  These days it seems “communist” and “socialist” are terms bandied about recklessly by Republicans, used to describe not only true socialists like Michael Moore, Ralph Nader or Paul Wellstone, but also moderate liberal Democrats, including our own beloved Chocolate Jesus.  And with the debacle of the Vietnam War, and Joe McCarthy’s defeat in the 1950s, the liberal establishment has quite effectively discredited anti-communism as a viable political agenda in the US.  Legitimate refugees from communist dictatorships, such as Cubans escaping from Castro’s regime or the boat people from Vietnam, are pretty much ignored or written off as cranks.  The Nazis remain perpetual bad guys, but when it comes to Stalin, Mao, or Pol Pot, the general attitude is, “what’s the big deal?”  Yet there is a thick volume, the Black Book of Communism, which chronicles the heavy body count of communist atrocities from the Russian Civil War (1917-22) all the way to the present day, with a natural focus on the USSR and Red China.   I don’t recall Spain being included, mainly because the communists failed to win the Civil War.  That doesn’t mean the PSUC didn’t have blood on its hands, not merely Falangists and Carlists, but innocent civilians, priests, nuns, monks, and even their fellow travelers of moderate socialists and anarchists (e.g. crackdown on POUM in Barcelona in May 1937).  While the Falangists had their own crimes to answer for, Stalin’s minions in Spain were competitive in brutality and ruthlessness.   To the Falangists of the Blue Division, communism was a very real threat, a very tangible octopus of evil, with its center in Moscow.  Having cut off a tentacle in Spain, the obvious next step was to slay it at home, in Russia.  

Their initial leader was General Agustin Munoz Grandes, who was well loved by his own troops and respected by the Germans.  The unit operated in Army Group North, in the Leningrad sector, and was heavily mauled in the battle of Krasny Bor in 1943.  The units were never large, and had no strategic impact, but they fought hard, fought well, and impressed both the Germans and the Russians with their skill and determination.  This was even more impressive due to the horrendous cold and snow, and nasty summer swampy weather (with mosquitos and malaria), a climate completely alien to Spaniards and unknown in Spain or its colonies. 

Friday, July 16, 2010

The World Cup



[Update 11/22/22:  This time around it's in Qatar (eastern coast of Arabian peninsula, on the Persian Gulf, south of Bahrain and north of UAE/Dubai.  As the temperature during the summer is unpleasant, the games are taking place in late November.  The US & Brazil are back - let's see how they do this time around.  Neymar seems to be the star of the current Seleção.]

I addressed this issue in 2006 years ago when Brazil lost to France in the eliminations back in the 2006 World Cup (“O Que Aconteceu???” = “What happened?”).  This time I’ll tackle it from a larger perspective, rather than just focusing on Brazil’s problems, although any World Cup discussion necessarily concerns Brazil.

 Every 4 years, since 1950, the world (except the US, do we qualify?) has been possessed by this international soccer competition.  Each part of the world has playoff slots to qualify, e.g. South America has 5 slots, the fifth of which requires a playoff vs. Oceania; Europe alone has several different divisions.  Brazil has never failed to qualify.

 This time around, 2010, the finals were held in South Africa.  After the first round, then the subsequent playoffs, a winner emerged on Sunday: Spain defeated Holland, each country trying for its first World Cup; Holland had made it to the finals in 1974 and 1978 but lost both times.  Each of them had defeated another team (Spain beat Germany, Holland beat Uruguay) and those teams played on Saturday; Germany is #3!

 For the first round, 32 teams compete in 8 groups of 4.  Each team plays its 3 competitors once, receiving 3 points for a victory, one point for a tie, and no points for a loss.  The top two teams from each group move on to the next round of playoffs.  These are “win or go home”, no home/away aggregates or best of 7 playoffs.

 Prior winners (and runners up in the final):
[2018     France (Croatia)
2014     Germany (Argentina)
2010     Spain (Holland)]
2006     Italy (France)
2002     Brazil (Germany)
1998     France (Brazil)
1994     Brazil (Italy)
1990     West Germany (Argentina)
1986     Argentina (West Germany)
1982     Italy (West Germany)
1978     Argentina (Holland)
1974     West Germany (Holland)
1970     Brazil (Italy)
1966     England (West Germany)
1962     Brazil (Czechoslovakia)
1958     Brazil (Sweden)
1954     West Germany (Hungary)
1950     Uruguay (Brazil)

 As you can see, Brazil has 5 World Cups, Germany 4, Argentina 2, France and Italy 2, and England and Uruguay 1 each.  Brazil was in the final in 1998 and 1950, so it could have had 7 World Cup victories.  In 1930, 1934, and 1938 there were World Cups, the winners being Uruguay (1930) and Italy (1934 and 1938).  The World Cups which would have occurred in 1942 and 1946 were disrupted by WWII. 

 US.  The US has never won.  However, it tends to dominate the North/Central America group for slots and get in with Mexico fairly consistently.  US players are beginning to get the crucial jobs playing for top flight European teams – better teams and starting positions.  Our best player, Landon Donovan, plays for the L.A. Galaxy and Everton (a Premier League team).  Clint Dempsey, arguably the second best, is being seriously considered by AC Milan. [Both are now commentators.]
            Unfortunately, we are still fair game for countries like Ghana (who?) which have equally strong teams but are politically inconsequential.  If it’s any consolation, Japan is in a similar position, and neither China nor Russia has ever been a major contender.  Neither of those countries, nor India, even qualified this time around.  All the World Cups since 1930 were won by teams in either Europe or South America, as were all the runners up, which leaves Africa, North America and Asia completely left out.  The US’ best finish was a de facto third place back in 1930.  For us to win the World Cup would be a Miracle on Grass, but if the French could do it (1998 & 2018) and the Spanish (this time – plus they had never even been to the final before, nor, for that matter, had the French) then who knows?

 Brazil.  By far the powerhouse and the ones to beat each time.  Brazil’s group this time, G, was called the “Group of Death” (possibly for the ill-fated North Korean team).  Sure enough, Brazil came out on top of that group and easily advanced to the second round.  I still don’t know how the Dutch defeated them, or the French in 2006.  My theory for 1998 (lost to France, in Paris, in the final) is that they were hungover on the field after prematurely celebrating their victory (?) against the underdog French.  Their 58/70 star was Pele, who is still a major figure in Brazil.  In the early 80s it was Zico (most often associated with Flamengo, and coach of Japan’s team in 2006).  By the late 90s and early 00’s it was Ronaldo – not to be confused with Cristiano Ronaldo of Portugal, or Ronaldinho – who scored both goal against Germany in 2002.  By now he’s back in Brazil playing for Corinthians.  These days the stars are Kaka (AC Milan, now Real Madrid), Robinho (Real Madrid, Manchester City, now back at Santos), and Maicon.  Ronaldo (past his peak) and Ronaldinho (still strong, debatable about his peak) were left off the team, and Rivaldo and Romario (notice they love those one-word names starting with R) were considered too old.  
            For their part, the French didn’t even make it out of the first round in 2002 or 2010, but beat the Brazilians in 2006, only to lose to Italy in the final.  That was the game with Zidane’s infamous headbutt. 

 DungaBrazil’s coach is nicknamed “Dunga”, which is Portuguese for “Dopey”, the dumbest of the Seven Dwarfs.  To me he looks like Mike Delfino, the plumber on “Desperate Housewives”.  But can you imagine if the US coach had that name?  “Let’s go live to Bob, who’s interviewing Dopey now” [with “DOPEY” in all caps under the live video interview of the coach].  Hilarious.
            Of course, since Dunga didn’t deliver a World Cup Final victory for Brazil, he got booted.  But even if he had won, chances are he would have resigned after the victory parade.  The job is non-stop stress for the 4 years or so (depending on when he got it), especially in Brazil, where anything short of complete victory = failure, and it seems that everyone claims to do a better job than the coach (“180 million coaches”).  The press are merciless, so I can understand why Dunga blew up during a press conference.  At least in the US, we don’t have 5 World Cup victories under our belt, so anything less than complete dominance is not considered a screwup.  Even so, we’re still competitive and like to believe we have a shot. 

 Germany.  They have [4] World Cup victories and came close this time, losing to Spain – who I was expecting them to beat.  They have been in the final 4 times; had they beat Brazil in 2002 both countries would have been tied at 4 World Cups.  The Germans are consistently competitive but can be extremely arrogant.

 Argentina.  Bitter rivals to the Brazilians.  Their star of 1978 and 1986, Diego Maradona, came back to coach them this time around.  As we know by now, he has a big mouth, but the Germans shut it for him quite dramatically. 

 Offense vs. Defense.  Baseball has the most rigid structure: the teams stick where they are until the at-bat team gets 3 outs.  In the NFL, this is less rigorous: it takes only a fumble or interception to change possession in a heartbeat, but these occur modestly relative to the amount of turnover-free series of possessions.  In soccer, as with basketball, a steal can rapidly switch possession from one team to another; in terms of the dynamics of possession, soccer most closely resembles basketball.  But a basketball court is much smaller, and it’s MUCH easier to make a basket than it is to make a goal.  One area where soccer definitely dulls me out, is when the winning team simply plays “keep away” with the ball, continually passing the ball back and forth between players, even as far back as their own goalie.  Because a 1-0 score is victory no matter how you slice it, this means a soccer game can slow down after only one goal. 

 Ties.  In most other sports, a tie or draw is rare.  In the NFL there would be overtime, and usually one team can score at least a field goal.  But 0-0 ties in soccer are fairly common.  For all but the eliminations, they are acceptable.  In the NFL, if one team runs up the score, that’s a dull game.  But in soccer, two evenly matched teams can hold each other goal-less, which to me is actually NOT an exciting game; in fact, if a team runs up the score it is more exciting (at least to me) than a 0-0 slugfest.  To me, the issue is goals vs. no goals; a 3-3 tie is still exciting, we get to see 6 goals scored.  

 Injury Time.  You know with any soccer game it will probably last only a little over 90 minutes, plus the 10 minute halftime.  Overtime, if necessary, is two 15 minute periods followed by a penalty shootout if the exta 30 minutes were still not enough for a goal.  There are no timeouts; the clock runs continuously; in Maracana Stadium, there isn’t even a clock for the fans or players to watch. 
            At the end of the 45 minute half, they add on 2-3 minutes of “injury time”.  This is the amount of time which had been wasted by various players pretending to be seriously injured by incidental contact with opposing players, in the hopes of earning a penalty kick because they’ve been unable to score a goal any other way.  In some cases the player cringes and cries, clutching an entirely different part of his body than was actually struck by the other player or the ball.  My solution?  If your “Injury” merited a penalty kick, you go off the field on the stretcher and are OUT of the remainder of the game.  Because too many of these crybabies are running around 5 minutes after the “injury” with no apparent problem.  If an NFL player is “injured”, chances are they really are.

 Fans vs. Players.  This doesn’t help soccer’s image of a sport played by effeminate Eurotrash boytoys like (gay icon) Beckham and Cristiano Ronaldo.  For every lower class Paul Gascoigne there seem to be dozens of jet-setting, metrosexual, overpaid playboys.  The two “Goal!” movies reinforce this even further (Newcastle and Real Madrid).  I don’t think they’re all like that, but certainly that’s the image they tend to advance.
            Contrast this with the image of European soccer FANS, especially in the UK.  In “Fever Pitch”, Colin Firth’s character is wary that his fellow teacher (the woman he likes) will write him off as a “yob” (lower class Neanderthal) because he supports Arsenal, i.e. that he follows soccer at all.  Certainly the press loves to hype the hooligan issue.    Groundskeeper Willie (The Simpsons): “You call this a soccer riot??”

Jerseys.  What I find amusing is that many countries have jersey colors which don't appear in their national flag.  Australia - yellow & green?  Germany - white?  Italy - blue??

 Crazy stuff.  This time around it was the annoying vuvuzelas (plastic trumpets) which produce the buzzing noise together.  Then there was the German octopus, Paul, who correctly picked the winners of every German game and the Final.  And Joachim Loew (German coach) had that lucky blue sweater; its luck ran out against Spain.  Then there was that Paraguayan model.  Schwing!

Let me add this (2022).  Let the players put a patch on their jersey indicating the professional team they play for.   That would help us recognize them a little better.  

Friday, May 1, 2009

The Spanish Civil War


“Fortune is not a train which passes every day at the same time.  She is a prostitute who offers herself fleetingly and then passes on to others.”  Ciano


 The more I read about this, the more fascinated I got with it, starting with Orwell’s Homage to Catalonia.  Orwell has a fantastically mellow way of describing everything, articulating facts in an amused manner.  What he experienced and saw there in Spain gave him a perpetual WTF kind of mood.  This led me to read another book, considerably more detailed, titled simply The Spanish Civil War, by Hugh Thomas.

 BackgroundSpain 1936.  The situation was majorly screwed up.  The government was nominally capitalist/democratic, with large substantial socialist and communist segments, and an anarchist movement lurking outside on the far left, mainly concentrated in Barcelona.  The right-wing elements did poorly in the elections, and a major right-winger, Jose Calvo Sotelo, was murdered.  The left-wing elements, particularly the anarchists, threatened revolution. No one was happy, but someone decided to do something about it.  In July 1936, starting in Morocco, a military rebellion broke out.  The government was republican/democratic/capitalist, whereas the rebels were fascist/nationalist. 

 The Fascists.  Led by General Francisco Franco, supported by Italy and Nazi Germany.  Franco’s rebellion started in the colonies (Morocco and Canary Islands) and quickly spread to Spain itself.  Franco had the Army and the Foreign Legion, while the Navy and Air Force (such as they were) remained loyal to the government.
            The Church supported Franco’s movement.  Although there was considerable friction and disagreement between the Falangists (fascists) and the Carlists (monarchists), ultimately Franco was able to sort everything out, “and in the darkness, bind them” – a Nationalist Spanish Sauron.
            Militarily, the fascists had several elements.  The most substantial were the Moroccan and Spanish Foreign Legion forces, which were the Spanish units of any real value and combat experience.  Initially they were stuck in Morocco due to an effective blockade by loyalist naval units.  However, soon after, the Germans provided Ju-52 transport planes which allowed most of Franco’s armies to be airlifted to mainland Spain.  Hitler remarked that Franco should build a Ju-52 memorial to recognize the value of these planes to his rebellion.
            Other elements were Falangist and Carlist volunteers, who were not regular military units.  Italy provided several Blackshirt and one regular Italian Army unit; Mussolini wanted to both give his armies some combat experience but also some glory.  Ironically, not only did these units perform poorly, they also embarrassed Mussolini AND ended up in combat against the Garibaldi Brigade, which was a unit of communist Italian volunteers fighting for the government; it seems the “volunteers” sent by Mussolini weren’t exactly volunteers, many of them were told they were being sent to Abyssinia.  Note also: there was a unit of Irish fascists fighting for the nationalists, which also – completely by accident – ended up in combat against International Brigades featuring English and Irish volunteers, in some cases against men who knew each other from WWI or the 1916 Rebellion (e.g. IRA forces).  Germany sent Panzer I’s, the Condor Legion, and various advisors, but no actual military units; Hitler was basically scheming to get maximum results from a minimal investment, hoping to tie down and distract the English, French and Russians in this backwater zone while he focused his real attention on Austria and Czechoslovakia.    

 Republican/Loyalist side.  This was considerably more confusing, as there were various forces momentarily allied with each other but working at cross purposes, sometimes with more antagonism and violence among each other than against the fascists.  The “center” bourgeois capitalist was squeezed out, really having no place on either side of the battle.  The CEDA (Confederacion Espanhola de Derechas Autonomas), under Gil Robles, was the closest to a center-right party, but this was dissolved in 1937 and Robles went into exile after the war.

 P.S.U.C. (Partido Socialista Unificado de Catalunha). This was the Socialist Party of Catalonia.
PCE (Partido Communista Espanha) Spanish Communist Party.  In Moscow it was determined that Spain was not quite ripe for a proletarian revolution, it being still in feudalism.  So what it needed was to move to capitalist democracy….so…the Communist line was to oppose revolution and support the government.  Indeed, they argued that fighting for revolution only strengthens the fascists, so any revolutionaries are in fact…fascist!  After some initial shipments of French aircraft from France – on the sly, because Leon Blum sympathized with the leftist Spanish government but didn’t want to antagonize the British, who were in favor of Franco - the major outside power supplying arms to the Loyalist/Republican side was the USSR, and it was only supporting the PSUC.  Stalin took most of Spain’s gold as “credit” for the planes, tanks, and machine guns, plus the pilots and advisors he sent.  The communists were the #1 factor on the “loyalist” side.  Indeed, the war was very much an ideological battle between the forces of fascism vs. socialism – with the bourgeois middle class almost nonexistent on the political map.
            The communists spent more time hunting down political rivals – socialists, non-Stalinist communists (aka “Trotskyists”) and anarchists – than they did fighting fascists.  They were ruthless, opportunist, and also making profits on the arms deals.  Stalin sold all the weapons to the government at full market value (as much as anything produced by a communist dictatorship has a value) and not simply at cost. 
            The communists also were trying to take over most of the military units and dictate most of the government’s policies, virtually turning Republican Spain into a Soviet puppet.  Many in the government, e.g. Azana, Negrin, Largo Caballero, and Prieto, would have liked to distance Spain from Russia and secure arms from England or the US, but Stalin had Spain’s gold supply.  Moreover, despite substantial public opinion in the US and UK in favor of the government and against the fascists, the US and UK governments were at best neutral (US) and at worst sympathetic to Franco (UK), and in any case were politically committed to nonintervention – however much of a farce “nonintervention” was, in reality, with Germany’s Condor Legion over the skies, Italian Black Shirt troops on the ground, and Russian planes, pilots, tanks, and military advisors in Spain.  Britain had substantial mining interests in Spain which could conceivably be – and often were – diverted to the Germans depending on the success of the fascists, so the British government had a substantial stake in hoping for Franco’s victory.  Texas oil companies were selling oil to Franco on credit, a deal which would be ruined if Franco lost.  Finally, FDR was concerned about alienating Catholic voters, who tended to support Franco.

 UGT (Union General de Trabaladores).  This was the socialist trade union.

CNT.  This was the anarchist trade union.  Its political side was the FAI (Federacion Anarquista Iberica).

 P.O.U.M. (Partido Obrero de Unificacion Marxista) This was the non-Stalinist Marxist party, also referred to as Trotskyist – although Trotsky himself denounced the POUM.  Opposed to the PSUC, the POUM decided that Spain was ripe for proletarian revolution and fought to achieve that.  Their concern was, “suppose we defeat the Fascists but keep capitalism anyway – why did we fight this war?  What’s the difference?  What’s the point in fighting the fascists if we aren’t going to have a worker’s society when this is all over?”  This put it at odds with the PSUC.  Orwell, along with many other volunteers who didn’t have explicit communist party backing from back home, ended up in this group.  Eventually the communists blacklisted the POUM and hunted down its members.  It reached the point of street fighting in Barcelona in May 1937, as described by Orwell.  As mentioned earlier, this side of the war had as much problem fighting among themselves as they did with the fascists, who ultimately managed to get their asses in gear under Franco.

 Anarchists.  This group was loosely allied with the POUM as it also wanted a revolution.  I always wondered why anarchists, who advocate no government – a decentralized economy where businesses are run by the workers themselves and no central authority to control, dominate, or exploit the workers – should ally themselves with socialists, who advocate even greater government (a dictatorship of the proletariat at least, if not nationalization and regulation of large parts of the economy, with the means of production in the hands of the government, ostensibly as a representative of the working class).  In essence, anarchists wish to leapfrog from capitalism to communism without going through socialism, and are true communists in the truest meaning – and the socialists were really those out for power for its own sake. 
            On the other hand the anarchists, by their nature, were difficult to control, so they basically did as they pleased, which sometimes devolved into little more than banditry.  Plus they had the perpetual dilemma of whether to acknowledge and support “the government” or to remain independent and a loose cannon, which the communists complained worked to weaken their side and play into the hands of the fascists.  Indeed, it was the unruliness of the anarchists vs. the excellent organization (if somewhat ruthless and intolerant) of the communists which persuaded many from various parts of the political spectrum to support the latter, even without understanding Marx or caring much for Stalin. 

 Catalan & Basque separatists.  It didn’t help the republican cause that in Catalonia (northeastern region near Barcelona) and in Basque territory (up near the French border) there was a substantial movement for independence from Madrid’s control and from Spain itself.  This managed to complicate matters dramatically without providing any tangible benefits for the separatists. 

 International Brigades.  Non-Spanish volunteer units fighting on the government’s side.  Exiled German and Italian communists joined these, along with French, Belgians, Americans (e.g. Abraham Lincoln Brigade) and English.  Some had WWI combat experience, others were just poets, writers, and other “fellow travelers”.  Anarchist units had, as can be imagined, difficulties with discipline issues, whereas the communists were often admired for their organization and discipline.  The Russians provided substantial advisors, even leaders, to these units and most of the tanks and weapons.  It was the International Brigades, led by General Miaja, who saved Madrid from the fascists in November 1936.

 Notables
There was actually another Spanish Civil War, in 1820-23, but one we usually think of is this one, from 1936-39.  Likewise, Spain had a military dictatorship in 1923-30 under Primo de Rivera, and his son Jose Antonio was a prominent member of the fascist elite. However, his son was imprisoned immediately after the rebellion broke out by the republicans, and was eventually executed. 
“Fifth Column”.  This expression was introduced into the language by nationalist General Mola, leading four columns of nationalist armies against the capital, Madrid, then held by the government/republicans.  He bragged that a “fifth column” of secret nationalist supporters in the city would aid their attack.  As it was, Madrid was attacked in November 1936, but General Miaja managed to rally the International Brigades into an effective defense of the city against the nationalists.  The city remained under siege and only fell when the whole war collapsed in March 1939.  With any civil war, duplicity and treachery were inevitable, so the government had a legitimate concern about such “fifth columnists”, but the communists tended to use this excuse to rid themselves of political rivals, e.g. POUM and anarchist forces with no known connection to the fascists.
“Molotov Cocktails”.  Glass bottles of gasoline with a burning rag tied around it.  Reportedly first used on October 29, 1936, by nationalist legionaires against the Russian T-26 tanks provided by Stalin to the government forces.
Guernica.  Bombed by the Condor Legion, and famously memoralized by the painting by Picasso.  Much of the civilian bombing was an experiment to see the reaction and results, but it’s unclear those results were clear enough to warrant continuing the policy in WWII against London.  Indeed, the public outcry against the bombing was so severe, that any tactical advantage on the ground was far exceeded by the political repercussions abroad.  The Germans had to backpedal and make up nonsense about trying to bomb the bridges or Basque explosives going off on their own. 
The German MG-34 machine gun and “88” anti-aircraft gun were first used in Spain.
Tanks.  The Germans provided Panzer I’s to the nationalists, of minor effectiveness due to being armed only with machine guns.  The Italians provided their own typically undersized, underarmored mini-tanks.  For the loyalist side, the Russians provided the T-26, which had stronger armor and a 40mm gun, and totally outclassed the Panzer Is and Italian “tanks”; though the nationalists were able to get their hands on some of these themselves by capturing them or offering bounties for their defection.
            The Germans, through Van Thoma, tried to experiment with massed tank attacks in Spain as a proving ground for their theories as articulated by Liddell-Hart and Guderian.  Unfortately they really didn’t have enough tanks to make this practical, but at least they realized this.  The Soviets went back convinced that the earlier “spread them out among infantry units” tactics were still valid, much to their detriment in the early days of Operation Barbarossa.
Air power.  The Spanish air force had been nothing to write about before the war, so neither side really had any meaningful air power when the rebellion broke out in July 1936.  The French provided some aircraft to the government early in the war, then the Russians took over this responsibility.  On the fascist side, the Italians and Germans supplied aircraft and many pilots, the latter being the famous Condor Legion.  The Russian planes proved to be competitive with the Italian planes, and to some extent the Me-109, which made its debut in Spain.  The Condor Legion featured such stars as the Me-109, the Ju-52, and the brand new Heinkel He-111 bomber, which participated in the Guernica bombing. 
For Whom The Bell Tolls.  This is Hemingway’s novel set in the war, in 1937, and made into a movie with Gary Cooper as the main character, Robert Jordan, and Ingrid Berman as his love interest, Maria.  Not being a big fan of Hemingway, the way I am with Orwell, I simply watched the movie.  Jordan is sort of an independent contractor working for the Republicans, and his assignment (“Mission: Impossible” theme plays here) is to blow up a bridge immediately before a Republican offensive so that the fascists are unable to send reinforcements.  He has to earn the trust of a band of irregulars, including Maria – who had her head shaved and was otherwise inconvenienced by a band of fascists who took over her town and murdered her parents – and Pilar, an older women jealous of Maria’s youth and beauty and who has an obnoxiously aggressive and cynical attitude.  The playoff character is her husband Pablo, who is now a drunken coward, resentful of the “Ingles” (English – Jordan) who comes by recruiting his own band for this bridge job.  Surely, when the bridge is blown, the fascists will come looking for the culprits, and he doesn’t want to risk his neck.   I found the movie long (3 hours) but suitably chock full of the various ingredients for a Spanish Civil War story: ragtag Republicans, some communist Republicans, and fascists with Spanish style uniforms but German helmets and weapons.  Of course the Spanish ask Jordan why he’s fighting a war far from his own country, in which he personally has nothing at stake.  Remind me how many Spanish units fought in the US Civil War.
Civil guards.  These were the hated local police in various towns, with their distinctive two-corner hats and green uniforms.  In republican sectors they often ended up lined against the wall by the irate locals.  These are not to be confused with the Assault Guards, who were the urban equivalents, and wore blue uniforms.  Most of the civil guards joined the fascists, while the assault guards mostly remained loyal to the government.  To make matters a little more confusing, the Falangists, Spain’s fascists, wore blue shirts, similar to Mussolini’s Black Shirts and Hitler’s Brown Shirts (SA). 

Progress.  In July 1936, rebellion broke out in various Spanish cities.  Depending on who chose which sides, the fascist rebels had various degrees of success across the country, which split up into rebel/fascist and loyalist/republican sectors.  For the time being, most of Franco’s forces were stuck in Morocco, with the republican navy sufficiently strong relative to the rebel naval forces to prevent a seaborne invasion of mainland Spain.  In each side’s sectors, the “wrong” people were either thrown in jail or shot.  In nationalist won sectors, these were socialists, communists, and anarchists.  In republican sectors, these were not only rebel officers, but also monarchists, Falangists, and also priests – and eventually anarchists and non-Stalinist communists (e.g. the POUM).  In republican areas, churches were burned, looted, and destroyed.  This was particularly bad wherever anarchists were prevalent.
            Eventually Franco’s reps in Germany managed to persuade the Nazis to loan them enough Ju52s to airlift the Moroccan forces to mainland Spain.  This airlifted nationalist force drove up the Portuguese border to the northern coast.  Madrid was besieged but not captured until the final collapse, thanks to a heroic defense of the city by General Miaja and the International Brigades in November 1936. In September-October 1937, the northern pocket of government resistance – in the Basque area close to France – was wiped out.
            The nationalists finally got their battleship online, the republican navy cowered in port in Cartagena, the Germans and Italians lent their own navies to assist the nationalists, while the Royal Navy – much to the embarrassment of many British politicians – avoided any kind of confrontation.  Thus what had been a republican blockade turned into a nationalist blockade.
            From March to July, 1938, the nationalists drove southeast and reached the Mediterranean, cutting off Barcelona (northeast pocket, Catalonia) from Valencia, which is where the government moved the capital once Madrid fell under siege, though the government had various expedients, by air and sea, by which to lessen the impact of this otherwise strategic defeat.  Various republican attacks initially surprised the nationalists in local sectors, but eventually Franco transferred troops from other sectors, took back the lost territory, so the republicans were left with heavy casualties they could ill afford, but no permanent gains.
            From December 1938 to February 1939, the nationalists followed up their earlier successes with a knockout blow to Catalonia, sweeping across to the French border and taking Barcelona without a fight.  By this point France and England recognized Franco’s regime as the legitimate government of Spain, and their acquiescence in 1938 with Hitler over Czechoslovakia made it clear to the republic that they could expect no real help from the democracies, who were willing to accept almost anything from Hitler and Mussolini just to avoid a war.  For his part, Stalin was also unwilling to do enough to ensure a republican victory.  Not only was he unwilling to risk a war over Spain, he was pissed that the British and French didn’t include him in the Munich peace talks and was convinced that dealing with Germany was far more worthwhile.
            Although the remaining republican forces in southeastern Spain, including Madrid, were substantial, the writing was on the wall – a threshold, tipping point was reached.  The Soviet advisors packed up and left while they still could, and the half the remaining Spanish officers either left or started making deals with Franco – or had been “Fifth Columnists” all along, most notably Colonel Casado.  By the end of March, Franco’s forces swept across the rest of Spain, with what was left of the republican army either melting away into civilian clothes or switching sides by entire units, many of their commanding officers having either been Fifth Columnists or simply persuaded by Casado to switch sides.  Large numbers of refugees had crossed over into France in huge camps, whereas the most prominent leftist politicians had fled out of Spain
            At this point Franco focused on rounding up his enemies who couldn’t make it out of Spain, the reprisals lasting well into the 40s.  Oddly, the leftists who went back to Russia ended up being wiped out by Stalin; having solid revolutionary credentials is often as much a liability as an asset, as it makes you a potential rival and thus a target for purges.  During WWII, Spain remained neutral, mostly out of fear of the French and British.  Franco did send troops to the Eastern Front, the Blue Division.  When it came time for Franco to pay up to the Germans what they owed, Hitler remarked that Franco made him “feel like a Jew”.
            In 1975, Franco died, and eventually Spain became a democracy for the first time since 1936.  The lasting legacies of the war were not only this regime which lasted almost 40 years, but also Germany’s blitzkrieg in the early parts of WWII.  It also served to uncover, for an earlier generation of socialists, communists, and anarchists not only the dangers of fascism but the ruthless opportunism of many on their own side, particularly in Russia – George Orwell being the most notable example to expose his discoveries not only in Homage to Catalonia, but also 1984

One Million Dead, by Jose Maria Girondella.  After having digested the lengthy and verbosely detailed The Spanish Civil War, by Hugh Thomas, and endured the dull and not particularly exciting movie adaptation of Hemingway’s “For Whom The Bell Tolls” (see above), I delved into this 668 page novel.  Unlike the latter, which only focuses on Jordan and a modest array of pro-Republican characters – all the Fascists are unknown extras only encountered at the very end – this gives almost equal time and sympathy to characters from both sides, as well as a wide array of historical characters, with the notable exception of Franco himself. 
            The main focus is on the Alvears, a family from Gerona, a town in Catalonia somewhere between Barcelona and the French border in northeastern Spain.  Their son Cesar, a seminarian, has been shot by the Reds at the very beginning of the story.  His brother Ignacio goes to Barcelona, then Madrid, crossing the lines there and finally joining a ski unit of the nationalist forces.  He romances Marta and Ana Maria.  His cousins in the nationalist zone end up victims of the Fascists.  Others include International Brigade characters, anarchists, communists, priests, Falangists, Russians, Germans (Nazis), Italians (a fascist delegate and a black shirt soldier), foreign journalists (Fanny and Bolen), and a few who find themselves not particularly disposed to one side or the other.  The story follows the characters throughout the war, from July 1936 through April 1939.  I found that it paralleled the non-fiction book very well, but giving a perspective from the ground, from the eyes of individual characters, so much so that perhaps someone else could forgo the non-fiction book in favor of this one alone and still come out with an excellent knowledge and understanding of the war.
            Three small portions I feel are worth reciting:
            1.  At the beginning of the story, Ignacio goes to the local cemetery in Gerona to find and identify his brother Cesar, who they believe – correctly – has been shot by the Reds.  Others are there for the same purpose.  One woman finds her husband’s body, with a note written in his handwriting in his pocket, addressed to her, “we’ll see each other in heaven.”
            2.  In Gerona, which was under communist control until the end of the war, many bourgeois and landowners were held in the prison, and occasionally “taken for a walk”, the slang word meaning taken out to be shot, almost at random.  The prisoners knew they were under a death sentence.  One landowner was taken out by car, with three communist militiamen.  When they reached a militia checkpoint, the victim – who knew exactly what was in store for him – opened the window and yelled, “Hey!  We’re Fascists!  Long live Franco!”, which led the checkpoint guards to open fire on the car, killing not only him, but also the driver, and wounding the two others. 
            3. The Alvears back in Gerona decide to adopt Eloy, a small boy who was orphaned when his parents were killed in the Condor Legion air raid on Guernica.  He seems happy enough in his new home, but when the air raid siren goes off, the poor boy panics and screams, and his new foster parents have to comfort him.