I’d already done a blog on Lord of the Rings (LOTR), now it’s hobbit time. For some reason I had tackled LOTR in print, and even digested The Silmarillion as well, but had never
read this one. With the new Peter
Jackson film coming out, I decided to read the book once and for all. I enjoyed it.
The original 1933 book by J.R.R. Tolkien came long before LOTR was published in the 1950s. It’s considerably shorter and warmer and
casual than LOTR (Central
Scrutinizer: “Hey, it’s me again.”), which makes it somewhat easier to read.
Plot: Hobbit (Bilbo)
goes on adventure with Dwarf (Thorin) and his friends, plus a powerful magic
guy (Gandalf), to win the dwarves’ treasure back from the dragon (Smaug) who
took it. Along the way the group meets
trolls, goblins, High elves, wood elves, spiders, eagles, wolves, and even
humans. Bilbo finds a magic ring which
makes him invisible, but this upsets its prior owner, the freak (Gollum). Bilbo talks to the dragon, and learns a
weakness. Told of this weakness, Archer
(Bard) shoots down the dragon. Dwarves
refuse to share treasure with Bard. War
breaks out between dwarves, elves and men.
Goblins attack. Dwarves, men and
elves team up and defeat goblins.
Dwarves reconsider and share treasure.
Everyone goes home. Happy ending.
The 2012 movie is part one of a trilogy to be released in
subsequent eons. Back in the 1970s, the
Rankin-Bass people (responsible for such holiday classics as “The Year Without
A Santa Claus”) took a stab at doing an animated film of “The Hobbit”. This version adds some goofy music, and
really makes Bilbo look like a dull tub of inoffensive goo. The best which can be said for this effort is
that it is very quick and efficient.
Jackson’s effort seems like an intense steroid injection to
get “The Hobbit” bulked up to the heavier specs of LOTR. Freeman is a
substantial figure, even with hairy feet.
The biggest boost is explaining what Gandalf was up to during the brief
interludes of the story where he leaves Bilbo and Thorin to their own devices,
which means including characters who were in LOTR but not The Hobbit
itself. The intensity is also dialed up
– yes, to LOTR spec.
At first I was upset that “Hobbit” was split into three like
LOTR instead of kept at one – until I
actually watched the film, in 48 fps format – and understood what Jackson was
trying to do. I suppose ultimate judgment should be deferred
until the final installment is released (and I’ve had a chance to see it) but
if the first of the trilogy is any indication, I’d say I agree with both the
attempt and the execution. Huzzah!
Bully!
No comments:
Post a Comment