It’s
not here because I only now discovered this album, or because I bought a new
and amazing remaster that changes the game completely. In fact, I stopped upgrading our original
Paris (FNAC) purchased vinyl to 180 grain at Sabotage, so our vinyl version of
this album is the one we bought in high school in the 1980s. I do have a remastered CD (2004 Universal/Sanctuary).
I’m commenting on this because this was on my DP/LZ/BS queue and it came up to listen to. It’s the last (#8) of the original slew of Black Sabbath albums with Ozzy Osbourne, and its tour was the last with Ozzy, Van Halen being the up and coming band opening for them. My impression is that it’s generally held in bad repute by 1) non-fans who don’t really like Sabbath and only willing to say good things if the album, e.g. Paranoid, is so obviously musically significant that they would look like idiots if they ignored or criticized it; and 2) Black Sabbath fans who prefer Ronnie James Dio over Ozzy Osbourne. For them, Heaven & Hell trumps any of the Ozzy albums, even Paranoid or Sabbath, Bloody Sabbath (my favorite). Us Sabbath fans who do prefer Ozzy to Dio (like me) generally concede it’s a substandard album, but listening to it again, sober on the treadmill, I’ve come to some fresh conclusions.
First off, Bill is drumming like crazy here. Moreover, the solos on even some of the otherwise less memorable songs is still blazing. So whatever else might have been going badly for them at the time – e.g. Ozzy leaving and then coming back, refusing to sing any Dave Walker material – when it came time to press RECORD and PLAY THE MUSIC they stepped up and got the job done. Were they coked up? Strung out? Hung over? Who knows. Somehow they did it.
Actually, I should add a third category of NSD haters: the band itself. Bill Ward seems to be the only one who defends it, and given his performance I’m not surprised.
Second, the prior albums were so good, that this album was doomed to suffer by comparison. Only the Beatles seemed to rise to the occasion of consistently outdoing themselves – coming from a fan who prefers the White Album to Dr. Pepper (and I know others who prefer Abbey Road).
Third, while I hear some jazzy stuff in there – particularly “Air Dance”, which is actually my favorite track, “Junior’s Eyes” being #2 – it still rocks. In a sense, they wound up like Budgie, pushing in some non-rock directions to break up the monolithic mold of the prior doomy albums. They recorded the album at Sounds Interchange in Toronto (the Canadian capital) and Rush Jr. aka Max Webster were recording Mutiny Up My Sleeve at the same time. Kim Mitchell mentions this, though no one in the Black Sabbath camp seems to mention Max Webster. Then again, Tony was also hanging out with Frank Zappa, who accompanied them on the tour, so perhaps yet another famous mustache-and-SG guitarist had his own influences which no one seems to acknowledge. Frank Sabbath? Perish the thought.
Fourth, listening to this not immediately after Technical Ecstasy (#7), but with the benefit of a few proto-Whitesnake albums by David Coverdale, returning to Sabbath was actually more of a relief and welcome rather than a disappointment. So I may have been more predisposed to be favorable than previously.
I’m commenting on this because this was on my DP/LZ/BS queue and it came up to listen to. It’s the last (#8) of the original slew of Black Sabbath albums with Ozzy Osbourne, and its tour was the last with Ozzy, Van Halen being the up and coming band opening for them. My impression is that it’s generally held in bad repute by 1) non-fans who don’t really like Sabbath and only willing to say good things if the album, e.g. Paranoid, is so obviously musically significant that they would look like idiots if they ignored or criticized it; and 2) Black Sabbath fans who prefer Ronnie James Dio over Ozzy Osbourne. For them, Heaven & Hell trumps any of the Ozzy albums, even Paranoid or Sabbath, Bloody Sabbath (my favorite). Us Sabbath fans who do prefer Ozzy to Dio (like me) generally concede it’s a substandard album, but listening to it again, sober on the treadmill, I’ve come to some fresh conclusions.
First off, Bill is drumming like crazy here. Moreover, the solos on even some of the otherwise less memorable songs is still blazing. So whatever else might have been going badly for them at the time – e.g. Ozzy leaving and then coming back, refusing to sing any Dave Walker material – when it came time to press RECORD and PLAY THE MUSIC they stepped up and got the job done. Were they coked up? Strung out? Hung over? Who knows. Somehow they did it.
Actually, I should add a third category of NSD haters: the band itself. Bill Ward seems to be the only one who defends it, and given his performance I’m not surprised.
Second, the prior albums were so good, that this album was doomed to suffer by comparison. Only the Beatles seemed to rise to the occasion of consistently outdoing themselves – coming from a fan who prefers the White Album to Dr. Pepper (and I know others who prefer Abbey Road).
Third, while I hear some jazzy stuff in there – particularly “Air Dance”, which is actually my favorite track, “Junior’s Eyes” being #2 – it still rocks. In a sense, they wound up like Budgie, pushing in some non-rock directions to break up the monolithic mold of the prior doomy albums. They recorded the album at Sounds Interchange in Toronto (the Canadian capital) and Rush Jr. aka Max Webster were recording Mutiny Up My Sleeve at the same time. Kim Mitchell mentions this, though no one in the Black Sabbath camp seems to mention Max Webster. Then again, Tony was also hanging out with Frank Zappa, who accompanied them on the tour, so perhaps yet another famous mustache-and-SG guitarist had his own influences which no one seems to acknowledge. Frank Sabbath? Perish the thought.
Fourth, listening to this not immediately after Technical Ecstasy (#7), but with the benefit of a few proto-Whitesnake albums by David Coverdale, returning to Sabbath was actually more of a relief and welcome rather than a disappointment. So I may have been more predisposed to be favorable than previously.
No comments:
Post a Comment